On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:41 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > I.e. what you currently implement is David's model without Konrad's > > later alternative really having been explored? Iiuc David's main > > reservation (which I share) was against a myriad of reset-this and > > reset-that hypercalls, which Konrad's reset-everything would > > address equally well.
FWIW it seems to me that David's suggestion without Konrad's modification is the simplest and least fragile approach. Is there some impetus to prefer a reset-all hypercall? [...] > The approach used in this series is not significantly different from how > an HVM domain is doing normal reboot: we destroy the original domain and > create a new one instead of cleaning up the original one (as it looks > safer and much easier I suppose). Right, that was my first thought too. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
