On 01/06/15 09:58, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 01.06.15 at 10:50, <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> On 06/01/2015 09:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> >>>> --- >>>> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> >>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei....@citrix.com> >>> Most people put the Cc about the cut (---) which is fine too. It means >>> the history ends up recording who was copied on the patch, which isn't >>> necessarily a bad thing. >> Right -- I would have thought that was useless information cluttering up >> the history, but I can see how it might actually be useful. Should I >> start putting my CC's above the ---? :-) > And should I stop dropping them even when above the --- for > commit, which so far I've been doing as I don't consider this > particularly useful information (other then e.g. who might have > commented on a change without it being recorded in an Acked-by > or Reviewed-by tag)?
Is the CC list useful to keep in history? It ends up being the list of people who didn't respond to it before it got committed (or ignored/missed the email entirely). It is the $FOO'd-by tags which are important when it comes to judging the acceptability of a patch. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
