>>> On 29.05.15 at 12:31, <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 28.05.15 at 14:12, <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> > Could you please make a concrete suggestion with table names and fields? >> >> I already pointed you at 6.0's new FADT field "Hypervisor Vendor >> Identity". > > OK, that is a decent alternative. > > We don't have a suitable hypercall to retrieve the evtchn PPI but we > could add one. Overall I still prefer the table approach, but if you > really don't want it, I can live with the hypercalls.
I'm clearly not in the position to force any design decision onto the ARM side of Xen. But I continue to be of the opinion that custom tables should be a last resort approach only, which isn't warranted here (anymore). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
