>>> On 22.05.15 at 14:57, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 22/05/15 13:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ... resulting from fbeef5570c ("x86/cpuidle: get accurate C0 value with
>> xenpm tool").
>>
>> Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>
> This appears to fix the issue.
>
> However, looking at the other cases which play the same games, 0 is used
> in preference to -1, given a zero last_state. It would seem logical to
> follow suit here (although it is just a debugkey so I am not overly fussed).
I have to admit that within that function (print_acpi_power()) I don't
see any "other cases which play the same games". Or are you
referring to pmstat_get_cx_stat()? While we shouldn't screw up
stat->last there, I think I agree that we also should account things
to C0 when we really don't know where things belong. V2 getting
ready...
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
