On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 06:01 +0100, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote: > = Prognosis = > > The states are: none -> fair -> ok -> good -> done > > none - nothing yet > fair - still working on it, patches are prototypes or RFC > ok - patches posted, acting on review > good - some last minute pieces > done - all done, might have bugs >
> == Hypervisor == > > * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (good) > - Justin T. Weaver > I was wondering whether it would make sense to break this in two: * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard affinity Justin T. Weaver The status of this is certainly good, as the code, in the last round of patches, was almost good enough for going in (just some adjustments required) * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu soft affinity The status of this is probably better captured by 'fair', as there is still some work to do. Also, Justin, sorry but I forgot what your deadline was, as IITR you were doing this for some university course, activity. Since I think it may have passed, are you still up for finishing this? I don't want to push, of course, I just wanted to know, to be able to make more accurate plans. :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
