On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 15:18 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 05/08/2015 03:12 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > If you agree on my plan of sending v2 of patch3, and if that will really > > be just the same of v1, but with "int ret=0", I'll stick these tags > > there, unless you tell me not to. > > I don't mind how you are doing it. The machine crashed even without > patch 2 when suspending with at least one free cpu, so this patch isn't > making anything worse. > Indeed! I can't tell about suspend, but I've seen it happening on shutdown... that's the purpose of the series! :-) > You can still apply my 2 *.by: tags, of course. > Ok, thanks. Regards, Dario
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
