On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:46:27PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.05.15 at 13:43, <elena.ufimts...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:50:56AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 28.04.15 at 01:50, <elena.ufimts...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> > +    if ( ignore )
> >> > +    {
> >> > +        dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> >> > +            "  Ignore the RMRR (%"PRIx64", %"PRIx64") due to "
> >> > +            "devices under its scope are not PCI discoverable!\n",
> >> > +            rmrru->base_address, rmrru->end_address);
> >> > +        ret = -EFAULT;
> >> 
> >> This wasn't there in the original code afaics, and adding it alters
> >> behavior (contrary to what the description claims).
> > 
> > Understood, will change patch description.
> 
> ??? I certainly meant for you to change the code, not the
> description.

Sure, will do.

> 
> Jan
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to