> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:27
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Keir (Xen.org)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] x86/hvm: give HVMOP_set_param and
> HVMOP_get_param their own functions
> 
> >>> On 05.05.15 at 17:47, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > The level of switch nesting in those ops is getting unreadable. Giving
> > them their own functions does introduce some code duplication in the
> > the pre-op checks but the overall result is easier to follow.
> >
> > This patch is code movement (including style fixes). There is no
> > functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org>
> > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c |  556 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> ------------
> >  1 file changed, 294 insertions(+), 262 deletions(-)
> 
> This doesn't apply to current staging (conflicts with at least
> 0a246b41cab40e3409c361c1ef6c1fcfaba5fd1f).
> 

Ok. I'll rebase and resend the series.

  Paul

> Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to