On 05/05/2015 01:25 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/05/15 16:02, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1760,6 +1760,9 @@ static struct notifier_block xen_hvm_cpu_notifier = {
static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void)
  {
+       if (xen_pv_domain())
+               return;
+
I take Andy's point that this looks a little odd, perhaps...

static void __init xen_platform_init(void)
{
     if (!xen_pv_domain())
         xen_hvm_guest_init();
}

Would be a useful follow up?

I'll apply as-is though



Yes, this would look better. I can respin this if you want to avoid the extra patch.

-boris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to