"Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> writes:
>>>> On 23.04.15 at 12:39, <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/shutdown.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/shutdown.c
>> @@ -37,46 +37,36 @@ void hwdom_shutdown(u8 reason)
>> switch ( reason )
>> {
>> case SHUTDOWN_poweroff:
>> - {
>> - printk("Domain 0 halted: halting machine.\n");
>> + printk("Hardware domain halted: halting machine.\n");
>> machine_halt();
>> break; /* not reached */
>
> Would it perhaps make sense (for the avoidance of ambiguity/
> confusion) to also print the hardware domain's domain ID?
Sure, why not. Did I get it right that we need to print
hardware_domain->domain_id and not hardware_domid here to support hwdom
kexec case?
--
Vitaly
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
