On 20/04/15 12:48, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 20.04.15 at 12:49, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >> --- a/docs/Makefile >> +++ b/docs/Makefile >> @@ -73,13 +73,11 @@ endif >> >> man1/%.1: man/%.pod.1 Makefile >> $(INSTALL_DIR) $(@D) >> - $(POD2MAN) --release=$(VERSION) --name=`echo $@ | sed 's/^man1.//'| \ >> - sed 's/.1//'` -s 1 -c "Xen" $< $@ >> + $(POD2MAN) --release=$(VERSION) --name=$* -s 1 -c "Xen" $< $@ > This is a change in quoting, and while benign now maybe it would be > better to add back quotation marks?
Are you sure? The result of the `` was not previously quoted, which is why I left it unquoted across the change. If quoting were an issue, all rules would need updating for $*, $< and $@ ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
