On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
> I wanted to make the proposal to archive the following two subproject on the
> grounds that they completed their goals
>
> a) http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/pvops.html
> b) http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/arm-hypervisor.html
>
> In the case of a) the goal was to establish Xen support in Linux, which has
> been achieved
> In the case of b) the goal was to establish ARM support in the Hypervisor
> which has been achieved
>
> According to http://xenproject.org/governance.html we would need to perform
> an archivation review. In this case, the situation is
> quite clear IMHO and I believe that we do not need to make an extensive case,
> besides the one above. So my proposal would be to
> just have a committer vote on these. I would be happy if committers and
> maintainers listed in a), b)
> and http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html were to just reply
> with the usual +1, 0, -1 to this thread.
>
> In practical terms, the following would happen. I would remove a) from the
> website and merge bits of b)
> into http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html
>
> There is no mailing list or repo impact for both projects, as both do not
> have separate lists.
>
> We would probably archive some pages in
> http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Category:PVOPS - I would need David and
> Konrad's help for
> that. Probably 15 minutes should be fine. Maybe in fact it may make sense to
> rename the Category to Linux.
>
> As far as I can see, none of the pages in
> http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Category:XenARM need to be
> archived. http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Archived/Xen_ARM_(PV) is already
> archived.
>
> We would probably also put together a blog post, once all of this has been
> done and maybe put together a press release (up to
> Sarah and the Advisory Board).
>
> Any views?
+1 on both counts
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
