On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:15 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > This implementation of writev_exact() will cope with an iovcnt greater than > IOV_MAX because glibc will actually let this work anyway, and it is very > useful not to have to work about this in the caller of writev_exact(). The > caller is still required to ensure that the sum of iov_len's doesn't overflow > a ssize_t. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
