On 10/04/15 16:24, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 10/04/15 15:19, David Vrabel wrote: >> asm/spinlock.h should not be included directly. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vra...@citrix.com> > > s/asm/xen/g instead of a straight delete? > > Otherwise you are relying on pulling in xen/spinlock.h implicitly.
None of these files declare a spinlock so getting the header implicitly is correct, IMO. David >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 1 - >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c | 1 - >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 - _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
