On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/04/15 14:38, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > The patch that will use xc_domain_maximum_gpfn is not included right now > > in this series as my other series significantly cleans up the existing > > xen-access test code. Before that's merged, there is no point in > > carrying that patch here as it will be in conflict anyway. I'm intending > > to send that once my cleanup series is merged (or append it to this > > series again if it's still open). > > I was going to say that xen-access is not modified to support ARM. But I > guess the xc_domain_maximum_gpfn will be used in order to fix it? > > Although, this hypercall is really buggy for ARM platform. It would be > better to pass to add a parameter in order to get the maximum pfn rather > than using the return value which will be truncated in many different > ways later. > > Regards, > > -- > Julien Grall > I think updating libxc to not truncate the value would be the preferred way to go forward (changing return type to uint64_t). I already added those changes to this patch and it's only a handful of instances. Tamas
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
