On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 12:03 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > I propose that the libxc series be accepted independently of the libxl > series.
That is most likely a good idea IMHO. What do you estimate the chances of the libxl bit being done for 4.6 to be? Is there an option of actually switching to the new libxc without switching libxl and fixing libxl later, or would that be as much work as just fixing libxl? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
