>>> On 27.03.15 at 13:28, <t...@xen.org> wrote:
> At 12:19 +0000 on 27 Mar (1427458745), Jan Beulich wrote:
>> As from osstest results it looks like commit ("x86: allow 64-bit PV
>> guest kernels to suppress user mode exposure of M2P") is guilty in
>> causing migration failures, comment out the meat of it without fully
>> reverting, until it is understood what is causing the issue.
>
> I'd prefer to just revert it unless there's a benfit to keeping some
> parts still enabled.
I'd like to avoid reverting 2e4e0d4efc as a prereq, and putting
together a revert without also reverting that other one I predicted
(maybe wrongly) to take more time than creating this one, and I'm
pretty short on time today. So yes, if you or Andrew want to put
together a full revert of just that one commit, you may consider it
pre-acked.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
