>>> On 24.03.15 at 16:12, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> 
> On 24/03/2015 14:20, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> @@ -1709,7 +1707,6 @@ static void do_cp15_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs,
>>           break;
>>       default:
>>           {
>> -#ifndef NDEBUG
>>               struct hsr_cp64 cp64 = hsr.cp64;
>>
>>               gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR,
>> @@ -1718,7 +1715,6 @@ static void do_cp15_64(struct cpu_user_regs *regs,
>>                        cp64.op1, cp64.reg1, cp64.reg2, cp64.crm, regs->pc);
>>               gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "unhandled 64-bit CP15 access %#x\n",
>>                        hsr.bits & HSR_CP64_REGS_MASK);
>> -#endif
> 
> Did you try to build with debug=n ? I suspect that GCC will warn about 
> the unused cp64.

I don't think so - gdprintk() in the NDEBUG case is specifically an
inline function instead of a macro, to avoid this very issue.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to