On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:56 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.03.15 at 13:51, <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 03/16/2015 12:48 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>  
> >> Them returning garbage isn't what needs fixing. Instead the code
> >> here should use a different condition to check whether this is the
> >> boot CPU (e.g. looking at system_state). And that can very well be
> >> done directly in this patch.
> > 
> > What do you suggest, then?
> 
> My preferred solution would be, as said, to leverage system_state.
> Provided the state to look for is consistent between x86 and ARM.
> 
Ok, I'll look into using that.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to