On Wed, Mar 11, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 10:45 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > +void libxl_device_vscsi_append_dev(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_device_vscsi *hst, > > + libxl_vscsi_dev *dev); > > +int libxl_device_vscsi_get_host(libxl_ctx *ctx, > > + uint32_t domid, > > + const char *cfg, > > + libxl_device_vscsi **vscsi_host); > What do these two non-standard functions do? > In general the caller would be expected to provide a libxl_device_vscsi, > which will be filled in, rather than having the function allocate one.
Is it OK if the caller allocates libxl_device_vscsi, but libxl does further allocations for the number of libxl_vscsi_dev? Related: I see libxl_device_vscsi_dispose does now a pointer check, so I assume its required to validate input in libxl_device_vscsi_get_host. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
