>>> On 10.03.15 at 20:48, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > Did you observe any code changes simply from changing = constraints to > +, or did we get very lucky in with the generated code?
I think it's not really unexpected that there was no change, since the operands were all memory-only ones (and generally gcc avoids to address the same memory location in multiple different ways). > I think it might be a very wise idea to switch to using symbolic names. > This code is very complicated and has many ways to go subtly wrong. Let's save this for another day. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
