>>> On 20.11.17 at 14:56, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 11/20/2017 06:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 20.11.17 at 12:20, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>> Which restriction? I'm loading the RSDP table to its architectural >>> correct addres if possible, otherwise it will be loaded to the same >>> address as without my patch. So I'm not adding a restriction, but >>> removing one. >> What is "architecturally correct" in PVH can't be read out of >> specs other than what we write down. When there's no BIOS, >> placing anything right below the 1Mb boundary is at least >> bogus. > > Unless it's a UEFI boot -- where else would you put it? Aren't these two > (UEFI and non-UEFI) the only two options that the ACPI spec provides?
Of course - we can't really expect them to cater for something like PVH. But this also means we can't always use the spec as reference point here. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
