Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> --- Do we need to add anything more here?
And do we need to include ARM ACPI for guests? CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com> CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> CC: Konrad Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> CC: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> CC: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> --- SUPPORT.md | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md index b95ee0ebe7..8235336c41 100644 --- a/SUPPORT.md +++ b/SUPPORT.md @@ -412,6 +412,16 @@ Virtual Performance Management Unit for HVM guests Disabled by default (enable with hypervisor command line option). This feature is not security supported: see http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-163.html +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough + + Status: Supported + +### ARM: 16K and 64K page granularity in guests + + Status: Supported, with caveats + +No support for QEMU backends in a 16K or 64K domain. + ## Virtual Hardware, QEMU These are devices available in HVM mode using a qemu devicemodel (the default). -- 2.15.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
