In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
index 0c1ec68..ed94ea0 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
@@ -1250,7 +1250,8 @@ static void pvcalls_front_changed(struct xenbus_device 
*dev,
        case XenbusStateClosed:
                if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
                        break;
-               /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
+               /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
+               /* fall through */
        case XenbusStateClosing:
                xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
                break;
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to