On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:18:52PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > While investigating an issue (in a new codepath I'd introduced, as it turns > out), leaving interrupts disabled manifested as a subsequent op in the > multicall failing a check_lock() test. > > The codepath would have hit the ASSERT_NOT_IN_ATOMIC on the return-to-guest > path, had it not hit the check_lock() first. > > Call ASSERT_NOT_IN_ATOMIC() after each operation in the multicall, to make > failures more obvious. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
