On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:21:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Right now, this is broken because libxl__build_device_model_args_new > is used also for the qemu run for pv guests for qdisk devices, pvfb, > etc. > > We can either make this option properly HVM-specific, or make it > generic. > > In principle it is a reasonable request, to make the PV qemu > deprivileged (even though it is not likely to be implemented any time > soon). So make this option generic. > > We retain the name "device model" even though it is arguably > inaccurate, because the xl docs already say, for example > For a PV guest a device-model is sometimes used to provide backends > for certain PV devices > > The documentation patch here is pure code motion. For ease of review > we will fix up the docs, so the wording to be right for the new > context, in the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > Reported-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
