On 10/10/17 13:36 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger....@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 4:31 PM
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 02:00:48PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > The 64-bit DMAR fault address is composed of two 32 bits registers
> > > DMAR_FEADDR_REG and DMAR_FEUADDR_REG. According to VT-d spec:
> > > "Software is expected to access 32-bit registers as aligned doublewords",
> > > a hypervisor should use two 32-bit writes to DMAR_FEADDR_REG and
> > > DMAR_FEUADDR_REG separately in order to update a 64-bit fault
> > address,
> > > rather than a 64-bit write to DMAR_FEADDR_REG.
> > 
> > I would add:
> > 
> > "Note that when x2APIC is disabled DMAR_FEUADDR_REG is reserved and
> > it's not
> > necessary to update it."
> > 
> > > Though I haven't seen any errors caused by such one 64-bit write on
> > > real machines, it's still better to follow the specification.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zh...@intel.com>
> > 
> > Given the reply from Kevin:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
> > 
> 
> Haozhong, can you resend a new version with patch description
> updated?

Sorry, I forgot it and will send.

Thanks,
Haozhong

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to