On 06/10/17 14:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:46:31PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> From 4.10 onwards, the configuration file should use type= in preference to >> builder/loader. Leave the older options for legacy compatability. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> >> --- >> CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> >> --- >> config/default-hvm.cfg.in | 5 ++++- >> config/default-pv.cfg.in | 5 ++++- >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/config/default-hvm.cfg.in b/config/default-hvm.cfg.in >> index 0de2546..c410eff 100644 >> --- a/config/default-hvm.cfg.in >> +++ b/config/default-hvm.cfg.in >> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ >> name="test-@@ENV@@-@@NAME@@@@VARIATION@@" >> -builder="hvm" >> + >> +type="hvm" >> +builder="hvm" # Legacy for before Xen 4.10 > Since this examples are only for >= Xen 4.10, does it really make > sense to keep the builder option here? > > Do we expect people to mix and match example configuration files?
There is only one version of XTF. It doesn't branch for different versions of Xen, so needs to support them all. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
