>>> On 14.09.17 at 14:58, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> The l1 mask needs to stay in x86/mm.c while l{2,3,4} masks are only
> needed by PV code. Both x86 common mm code and PV mm code use
> base_disallow_mask and l1 maks.
>
> Export base_disallow_mask and l1 mask in asm-x86/mm.h.
So that's because in patch 20 you need to keep
get_page_from_l1e() in x86/mm.c, due to being used by shadow
code. But is shadow using the same disallow mask for HVM guests
actually correct? Perhaps it would be better for callers of
get_page_from_l1e() to pass in their disallow masks, even if it
would just so happen that PV and shadow use the same ones?
Tim, do you have any thoughts or insights here?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
