On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 20.09.17 at 22:57, <ta...@tklengyel.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> @@ -1226,9 +1226,13 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE
>> *SystemTable)
>> efi_bs->FreePool(name.w);
>>
>> if ( !EFI_ERROR(efi_bs->LocateProtocol(&shim_lock_guid, NULL,
>> - (void **)&shim_lock)) &&
>> - (status = shim_lock->Verify(kernel.ptr, kernel.size)) !=
>> EFI_SUCCESS )
>> - PrintErrMesg(L"Dom0 kernel image could not be verified",
>> status);
>> + (void **)&shim_lock)))
>> + {
>> + if ( shim_lock->Verify(kernel.ptr, kernel.size) != EFI_SUCCESS
>> )
>> + blexit(L"Dom0 kernel image could not be verified by the
>> shim.");
>> +
>> + PrintStr(L"Dom0 kernel image was verified by the shim.\r\n");
>> + }
>
> So what is the actual behavioral change you're trying to
> accomplish? PrintErrMesg() already calls blexit(),
Indeed, I've somehow missed that. Sorry for the noise.
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
