Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/22] xentoolcore, _restrict_all: Introduce new
library and implementation"):
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > +void xentoolcore__register_active_handle(Xentoolcore__Active_Handle*);
> > +void xentoolcore__deregister_active_handle(Xentoolcore__Active_Handle*);
>
> Why use two underscores in those function names?
These functions are for use by other Xen libraries only, not by
external callers.
> Is this library supposed to be stable? We only expect this to be tech
> review, right? I think it is worth explicitly stating that if that's
> the case.
The API/ABI to xentoolcore_restrict_all is intended to be stable.
The internal API may vary.
The head comment of xentoolcore_internal.h says
* Interfaces of xentoolcore directed internally at other Xen libraries
but I can make this more explicit if you want.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
