Hi Jan,
On 01/09/17 11:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
I've recently got sufficiently annoyed by people not applying enough
common sense to get_maintainer.pl output, Cc-ing all REST maintainers
on ARM-only public interface changes.
It seems that you didn't move arch-arm.h, arch-x86_{32,64}.h under resp.
ARM and x86 maintainership. Was it intentional?
Cheers,
Sort ARM's xen/ groups of path specifications at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -166,14 +166,15 @@ S: Supported
L: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
F: docs/misc/arm/
F: xen/arch/arm/
-F: xen/include/asm-arm/
-F: xen/drivers/char/cadence-uart.c
F: xen/drivers/char/arm-uart.c
+F: xen/drivers/char/cadence-uart.c
F: xen/drivers/char/exynos4210-uart.c
F: xen/drivers/char/omap-uart.c
F: xen/drivers/char/pl011.c
F: xen/drivers/char/scif-uart.c
F: xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/
+F: xen/include/asm-arm/
+F: xen/include/public/arch-arm/
CPU POOLS
M: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
@@ -434,6 +435,7 @@ S: Supported
L: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
F: xen/arch/x86/
F: xen/include/asm-x86/
+F: xen/include/public/arch-x86/
F: tools/firmware/hvmloader/
F: tools/firmware/rombios/
F: tools/firmware/vgabios/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
