Hello, Anil Madhavapeddy, on jeu. 14 sept. 2017 15:38:54 +0100, wrote: > On 13 Sep 2017, at 17:13, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> > wrote: > > Anil Madhavapeddy, on mer. 13 sept. 2017 11:11:03 +0100, wrote: > >> Maintaining a forked MiniOS has been a multi-year source of a maintenance > >> burden for MirageOS, > > > > I'm just wondering why this happened? > > > > The mini-os repository is open for development, it's just a matter of > > agreeing on how to implement features :) > > We forked it well before mini-os spun out into a separate repository, > around 5 years ago.
Ok :) > It's a combination of both I think. I had a very quick look at the latest > mini-os > tree and ran into build problems from the master branch Ok, so it's just a matter of cleanly working on it. Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
