> On Sep 11, 2017, at 13:01, George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: > > +### XSM & FLASK > + > + Status: Experimental > + > +Compile time disabled > + > +### XSM & FLASK support for IS_PRIV > + > + Status: Experimental
In which specific areas is XSM lacking in Functional completeness, Functional stability and/or Interface stability, resulting in "Experimental" status? What changes to XSM would be needed for it to qualify for "Supported" status? If there will be no security support for features in Experimental status, would Xen Project accept patches to fix XSM security issues? Could downstream projects issue CVEs for XSM security issues, if these will not be issued by Xen Project? Rich _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
