On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 01:36:36AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:29 -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > > > > Or, in general, make sense out of the fact that the stack pointer > > > register changes in such a way that, when we get back in > > > do_softirq(), > > > what's in the stack in the place where there was the 'cpu' local > > > variable has (at least in some circumstances) changed? > > > > I think yes, it could cause the smp_processor_id() mismatch. > > > Ok, then the patch was wrong (sorry again), and should stay reverted. > > I still find the comment very confusing (if correct at all), and I'll > probably send a new patch to improve it. >
Yes please. :-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
