On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 18:01 -0700, Mike Latimer wrote: > On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 03:07:25 PM Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > freemem_slack accounts for the amount of memory to be left free in the > > system because empirical experiments seem to demonstrate that is needed > > for "stability reasons". > > > > As we don't have any actual data on these stability issues, remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> > > I just finished tested this patch in conjunction with the > LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT > removal patch. The freemem_slack zone is no longer reserved, and that aspect > of the ballooning issue appears fixed. > > There is still a problem with xl's freemem loop, but we can investigate that > further with slack out of the picture. > > From my side: > > Acked-by: Mike Latimer <mlati...@suse.com>
Me too. I think I'm right in saying that this patch isn't affected by any of the other on going discussion, so I've applied it. Please let me know if I was wrong! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
