>>> On 18.08.17 at 15:45, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:45:50PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: >> > >> >> > + } >> >> > + } >> >> > + } >> >> >> >> This still looks wrong to me. How do you know acpi_modules[0] is DMAR >> >> table? >> >> >> > >> >Oh, I sorta see why you do this, but I still think this is wrong. The >> >DMAR should either be a new module or be joined to the existing one (and >> >with all conflicts resolved). >> >> Hi, Wei >> Thanks for your comments. >> >> iirc, HVM only supports one module; > > This is indeed how it is stated in various comments. I'm not sure why > there is such restriction. Maybe x86 maintainers can shed more light on > this?
Not me, sorry. Maybe ask whoever has written that code? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
