On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:59:02PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.02.15 at 16:55, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Make XENMEM_increase_reservation and XENMEM_populate_physmap
> > vNUMA-aware.
> > 
> > That is, if guest requests Xen to allocate memory for specific vnode,
> > Xen can translate vnode to pnode using vNUMA information of that guest.
> > 
> > XENMEMF_vnode is introduced for the guest to mark the node number is in
> > fact virtual node number and should be translated by Xen.
> > 
> > XENFEAT_memory_op_vnode_supported is introduced to indicate that Xen is
> > able to translate virtual node to physical node.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> 
> As I massaged your first patch (also, but not only, to do what Andrew
> requested), this one will need adjustment too. Perhaps additionally if
> the 2nd one is to be dropped...
> 

I can resend after we come to conclusion on what to do with patch 2.

Wei.

> Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to