Hi,
On 18 July 2017 at 17:00, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> CC x86 maintainers
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:19:19PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> >
>> > ("arch_arm", Struct(None, [("gic_version", libxl_gic_version),
>> > + ("vuart", libxl_vuart_type),
>>
>> ... here it is ARM specific. I am not convinced that we should tie vuart to
>> ARM only. I cannot see why x86 would not be able to use it in the future.
>> Any opinions?
>
> I don't know. I asked Bhupinder to put it here because it looked arm
> specific to me. I will let x86 maintainers to decide whether they want
> such thing.
What is the decision on this?
I believe that since most of the vuart code added in libxl is arch
agnostic, it should be fine to keep the libxl_vuart_type as a generic
type.
Regards,
Bhupinder
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
