On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 17:52 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 07/25/2017 05:47 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > > All that being said, it probably would be good to add a performance > > counter, and try to get a sense of how frequently we actually end > > up in > > this function as a fallback. > > > > But in the meantime, yes, I'd try to make svc stay in the runqueue > > where it is, in this case, if possible. > > Sounds good. So are you going to respin the series then? > Yep, I'll rebase and respin this series. And then rebase the caps series on top of this and respin it too.
Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
