On 26/02/15 16:28, Tim Deegan wrote: > > BTW, ring.h is the only instance of that, so the extra diff to clear > that up too is pretty small (see below). > > Not sure what people think about that though - it might be > quite a PITA for downstream users of it, though they ought really to > be using local copies so they can update in a controlled way.
With my linux maintainer hat on, this is fine by me. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
