Hi,
On 18/07/17 16:29, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:11:30PM +0530, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/xen/common/numa.c b/xen/common/numa.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0381f1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/common/numa.c
@@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
+/*
+ * Common NUMA handling functions for x86 and arm.
+ * Original code extracted from arch/x86/numa.c
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
+ * License, version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <xen/init.h>
+#include <xen/ctype.h>
+#include <xen/sched.h>
+#include <xen/nodemask.h>
+#include <xen/numa.h>
+#include <xen/keyhandler.h>
+#include <xen/time.h>
+#include <xen/smp.h>
+#include <xen/pfn.h>
+#include <xen/mm.h>
+#include <xen/softirq.h>
+#include <xen/string.h>
+#include <asm/acpi.h>
+
Since you're moving code anyway, please sort the headers alphabetically.
+static int numa_setup(char *s);
+custom_param("numa", numa_setup);
+
+struct node_data node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
+
+/* Mapping from pdx to node id */
Is this comment applicable to ARM? Does arm has PDX?
Yes ARM has PDX. For new architecture we expect the code to provide
dummy helpers if they want to support NUMA.
+unsigned int memnode_shift;
+
+/*
+ * In case of numa init failure or numa off,
+ * memnode_shift is initialized to BITS_PER_LONG - 1. Hence allocate
+ * memnodemap[] of BITS_PER_LONG.
+ */
+static typeof(*memnodemap) _memnodemap[BITS_PER_LONG];
+unsigned long memnodemapsize;
+uint8_t *memnodemap;
+
+nodeid_t __read_mostly cpu_to_node[NR_CPUS] = {
+ [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
+};
+
+cpumask_t __read_mostly node_to_cpumask[MAX_NUMNODES];
+
+bool numa_off;
+s8 acpi_numa = 0;
+
+int srat_disabled(void)
bool here.
Should probably be done in a previous patch.
Actually, the previous version had srat_disabled return bool. I am aware
that Jan and I requested to keep acpi_numa as int, I didn't find any
request of keep moving srat_disabled to int. So can you explain why??
+
+void __init numa_init_array(void)
+{
+ int rr, i;
+
+ /* There are unfortunately some poorly designed mainboards around
+ that only connect memory to a single CPU. This breaks the 1:1 cpu->node
+ mapping. To avoid this fill in the mapping for all possible
+ CPUs, as the number of CPUs is not known yet.
+ We round robin the existing nodes. */
Please fix the coding style issue here.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
