Hi Wei,
Thanks for the review.
This field is already defined in the display protocol.
To avoid misunderstanding I prefer to use same name in libxl
as well.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:03:17PM +0300, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Grytsov <oleksandr_gryt...@epam.com>
>>
>> Add libxl_device_vdispl and libxl_vdisplinfo to libxl_types.idl
>> Add VDISPL to libxl__device_kind enumerator
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Grytsov <oleksandr_gryt...@epam.com>
>> ---
>> tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl | 38
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> tools/libxl/libxl_types_internal.idl | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
>> index 2204425..25563cf 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
>> @@ -755,7 +755,21 @@ libxl_device_vtpm = Struct("device_vtpm", [
>> ("backend_domname", string),
>> ("devid", libxl_devid),
>> ("uuid", libxl_uuid),
>> -])
>> + ])
>> +
>> +libxl_connector_param = Struct("connector_param", [
>> + ("id", string),
>> + ("width", uint32),
>> + ("height", uint32)
>> + ])
>> +
>> +libxl_device_vdispl = Struct("device_vdispl", [
>> + ("backend_domid", libxl_domid),
>> + ("backend_domname", string),
>> + ("devid", libxl_devid),
>> + ("be_alloc", bool),
>
> After reading the doc -- use "allocator" for this field?
--
Best Regards,
Oleksandr Grytsov.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
