On 27/06/17 19:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> 06/26/17 6:29 PM >>> >> Rename it to pv_raise_interrupt. > Is "interrupt" really a suitable term here? These are all exceptions being > raised, not (external) interrupts.
This function is really NMIs and MCEs only, and it only gets used for the former. (on a technicality, NMIs are classified as Interrupts rather than Exceptions). Furthermore, it is only actually used for latching an NMI as pending with dom0 from NMI context. MCEs take a different path. I've been considering whether this mechanism can be done any better. I expect it can, but I haven't got a better plan yet. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel