Hi, On 23/06/17 10:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.17 at 11:24, <t...@xen.org> wrote:At 03:18 -0600 on 23 Jun (1498187924), Jan Beulich wrote: How about: - keep INVALID_MFN as an inline function call for most uses; - #define INVALID_MFN_INITIALIZER { ~0UL } for when we need a real constant initializer aat file scope.I'd be fine with that as much as with the other model.
I will send a patch to revert 725039d39e "mm: don't use _{g,m}fn for defining INVALID_{G,M}FN" and one to add INVALID_MFN_INITIALIZER.
Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
