On 23/06/17 15:49, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:41:29PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/06/17 18:11, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
>>> ---
>>> xen/arch/x86/pv/hypercall.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c | 36 ------------------------------------
>>> xen/include/asm-x86/hypercall.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/hypercall.c
>>> index 7c5e5a629d..287340e774 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/hypercall.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/hypercall.c
>>> @@ -255,6 +255,42 @@ enum mc_disposition arch_do_multicall_call(struct
>>> mc_state *state)
>>> ? mc_continue : mc_preempt;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void hypercall_page_initialise_ring3_kernel(void *hypercall_page)
>>> +{
>>> + char *p;
>>> + int i;
>> void *p = hypercall_page;
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* Fill in all the transfer points with template machine code. */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < (PAGE_SIZE / 32); i++ )
>>> + {
>> i++, p += 32
> Wait, I think pointer arithmetic is not allowed on void* ?
void pointer arithmetic is a GCCism, which we use in plenty of other
locations.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
