On 23/06/17 15:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:45:22PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 23/06/17 14:43, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 23/06/17 14:33, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 23/06/17 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I am a bit confused, the title says "PATCH for-4.9 v3 3/3". I haven't
been CCed on the first two patches. Does it mean you are only looking
at this patch to be in 4.9?
Sorry - I messed up the CC lists. The correctness of this patch does
depend on the previous two, so all 3 are looking for inclusion.
Given that we don't have livepatch testing in osstest how much test
have we done on those 3 patches?
There is testing in OSSTest.
Hurray hurray hurray!
I've manually run each of the scenarios, including with my livepatch
which has a STN_UNDEF relocation.
I don't know what testing Konrad has done.
I run a version of the same tests that are in OSSTest (basically an earlier
version of the Perl code) and I have done it on x86 and on ARM32.
And I also run the standalone OSSTest (on x86)
And then I also do a livepatch using the livepatch-build-tools on x86 to
patch some silly function.
So from a testing perspective these patches have been tested very exhaustively.
Well it has not been tested on ARM64 :). I am about to do that.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
