Hi Wei,
On 06/19/2017 12:39 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:11:48AM +0800, Zhongze Liu wrote:
GCC 7.1.1 complains that several buffers passed to snprintf() in xenpmd
and tools/ocmal/xc are too small to hold the largest possible resulting string,
which is calculated by adding up the maximum length of all the substrings.
The warnings are treated as errors by -Werror, and goes like this (abbreviated):
xenpmd.c:94:36: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing up to
255 bytes into a region of size 13 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
#define BATTERY_INFO_FILE_PATH "/proc/acpi/battery/%s/info"
^
xenpmd.c:113:13: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 25 and 280 bytes into a
destination of size 32
xenpmd.c:95:37: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing up to
255 bytes into a region of size 13 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
#define BATTERY_STATE_FILE_PATH "/proc/acpi/battery/%s/state"
^
xenpmd.c:116:13: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 26 and 281 bytes into a
destination of size 32
xenctrl_stubs.c:65:15: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing
up to 1023 bytes into a region of size 252 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
"%d: %s: %s", error->code,
^~
xenctrl_stubs.c:64:4: note: ‘snprintf’ output 5 or more bytes (assuming 1028)
into a destination of size 256
Enlarge the size of these buffers as suggested by the complier
(and slightly rounded) to fix the warnings.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Zhongze Liu <blacksk...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
Applied.
Julien, consider this for 4.9?
Looking quickly at the patch, it sounds a bit strange to allocate 1028
bytes on the stack. It is more than 1/8 of default stack in Linux (8K).
Are we sure the stack will never explode?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
