Hi Ian,

On 23/02/15 15:20, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:28 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> The priority is controlled by route_irq_to_guest and set statically
>> using GIC_PRI_IRQ.
>>
>> If we decide to hardcoded the priority here, we should drop the
>> parameter on gic_route_irq_guest. But not keeping both.
> 
> There is a middle ground, which is for guest-routed IRQs to be allowed a
> subset of the real priorities, but until those associated checks are in
> place I think hardcoding in gic_route_irq_to_guest leaves less scope for
> mistakes.

The interface for routing an IRQ to xen (gic_route_irq_to_xen) is taking
the priority in parameter.

I would prefer if we keep the same interface for guest and then hardcode
the value in route_irq_to_guest.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to