>>> On 31.05.17 at 12:01, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 31/05/17 08:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >> There's no reason to burn 4 bits on page type when we only have 7 types >> (plus "none") at present. This requires changing one use of >> PGT_shared_page, which so far assumed that the type is both a power of >> 2 and the only type with the high bit set. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Any particular reason why you reverse the order of shared and writeable?
I've become very used to know that type 7 is "writable", and since there was a gap at 6 it seemed reasonable to put "shared" there instead of shifting both down by one. > Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> Thanks. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
